The NHM holotype photograph is an exact-species match. Other downloaded images show L. davidi or a genus reconstruction and are labelled as comparisons. Wikipedia is genus-level.
Genus reconstruction; not verified as L. sinensis 1452 × 672 · Original downloaded; no upscaling PaleoEquii · CC BY-SA 4.0 Source and permissionsDifferent species L. davidi; genus comparison ONLY, not L. sinensis 4636 × 1832 · Original downloaded; no upscaling Dwergenpaartje · CC BY-SA 3.0 Source and permissionsExact species: holotype NHMUK PV P 7358 1440 × 995 · Original downloaded; no upscaling The Trustees of the Natural History Museum, London · CC BY 4.0 Source and permissions
Selected publications / 重点文献
Vertebrata PalAsiatica · 1995 Direct specialist source; Jin Fan, Zhang Jiangyong, Zhou Zhonghe; 33(3):169–193 Relevance: Direct L. sinensis description and plate II, figure 2
Includes identified L. sinensis material from western Liaoning and a species illustration. This is more directly relevant to identification than a general Jehol review.
Palaeontology · 2015 Leading specialist journal Relevance: Genus-level taphonomy; not specific to L. sinensis
Analyzes Lycoptera fossil beds and preservation processes. Use it for depositional and mortality context, not as species-level evidence for the exhibit.
研究义县组狼鳍鱼化石层的埋藏过程,适合说明沉积与死亡背景,不能充当展品种级鉴定依据。
Verified citation and summary; full PDF not obtained
National Science Review · 2014 Major multidisciplinary review Relevance: Jehol ecosystem context; not an exact-species paper
Reviews Jehol diversity, preservation and evolutionary significance. Lycoptera is part of the biota’s traditional definition; this review supplies ecosystem context rather than a revision of L. sinensis.